翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences ・ Bigelow Methodist Episcopal Church, South ・ Bigelow Neighborhood ・ Bigelow Peak ・ Bigelow Preserve ・ Bigelow Rock ・ Bigelow Rosenwald School ・ Bigelow School ・ Bigelow School (Boston, Massachusetts) ・ Bigelow School (Mequon, Wisconsin) ・ Bigelow Street Historic District ・ Bigelow Tavern Historic District ・ Bigelow Tea Company ・ Bigelow Township, Nobles County, Minnesota ・ Bigelow United Methodist Church ・ Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. ・ Bigelow v. Virginia ・ Bigelow, Arkansas ・ Bigelow, Kansas ・ Bigelow, Minnesota ・ Bigelow, Missouri ・ Bigelow-Ben Lomond Hotel ・ Bigelow-Page House ・ Bigelowia ・ Bigelowia nudata ・ Bigelowia nuttallii ・ Bigelowiella ・ Bigelowiella natans ・ Bigeminy ・ Bigend Saddle Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. ''Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.'', 327 U.S. 251 (1946), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court allowing an action to recover compensatory damages under the antitrust statutes. The jury had returned a verdict for $120,000 in petitioner's favor, covering a five-year period where plaintiff suffered due to respondents antitrust conspiracy. The trial court, sitting in the Northern District of Illinois, gave judgment for treble damages, as prescribed by § 4 of the Clayton Act. The 7th Circuit reversed on the sole ground that the evidence of damage was not sufficient for submission to the jury, and directed the entry of judgment for respondents ''non obstante veredicto'' (notwithstanding the verdict).〔150 F.2d 877 (7th Cir. 1945)〕 The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the evidence of damage was sufficient to support the verdict. Respondents argued that any measure of damages would be too speculative and uncertain to afford an accurate measure of the amount of the damage.〔327 U.S. 251, 263〕 The Supreme Court disagreed, not wanting to let the respondent defeat a remedy because its antitrust violation was so effective and complete. The Court held that the jury could return a verdict for the plaintiffs, even though damages could not be measured with the exactness which would otherwise have been possible, so long as the jury made a "just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data".〔''Id''. at 264〕 The judgment of the district court was affirmed and the judgment of the court of appeals was reversed. ==Facts== Petitioners, owners of the Jackson Park motion picture theatre in Chicago, alleged that respondents, some of whom, like RKO Pictures, were distributors of films, and some of whom owned or controlled theatres in Chicago, entered into a conspiracy which continued from some time before November 1936 to the date the suit was brought, July 28, 1942. During the conspiracy, films were distributed among cinemas in Chicago in such a manner that theatres owned by some of the conspirators were able to show movies before independent theater operators. Independent exhibitors were not able to show new movies until the conspirators had finished with a "first run". The first question was whether there was an unlawful conspiracy, and the second question was how to measure the damages for any loss, given the difficulty of knowing how many people might have attended different films. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.